The concept of the Platonic Ideal is a system for understanding and participating in the world. According to this system, there is an ideal Form to both sensible things, such as chairs and houses, and concepts, such as justice and beauty. IT is based on the premise that there are shades, or degrees of reality: what we see to be a chair, for instance, is only the “shadowy” essence of that chair [598c, Republic], and likewise for Truth, Equality and Justice. For Plato, it is the job of the crafter, be it carpenter, thinker or any other skilled person, to engage in their respective craft and attempt to approximate the Ideal Form of their subject matter.
Thursday, June 21, 2007
Monday, June 04, 2007
On Imagism
There is a structure which will underlie this sequence of blog entries. When the structure is apparent, the direct relevance of the preceding pieces offered by Gene Fowler and David Moorman with be seen in clear relief. Before we proceed we must examine one more bit of lacunae, the doctrines of Ezra Pound. The underlying quest here is to determine what light Mr. Ezra Pound can shed on the subjects of art, artifice, craft and Truth.
He published an essay in the journal Poetry on a topic he called “Imagism”:
An ‘Image’ is that which presents an intellectual and emotional complex in an instant of time….It is the presentation of such a ‘complex’ instantaneously which gives that sudden sense of liberation….which we experience in the presence of the greatest works of art.
It is better to present one Image in a lifetime than to produce voluminous works.
Cited in Humphrey Carpenter’s 1988
Biography of Pound , A serious Character, p. 197
This concept applies to all branches of the arts. It describes the quest or compulsion of the artist, always on the hunt for the Image. In a more refined way, the Poet David Moorman referred to draft of a manuscript of his poems as ‘almost hitting the Platonic.’ I interpret that to mean that the poems always existed and it was but for the artist to pull them out of the air and realize them in the lesser, material world. The word “Image” is capitalized.
Hans Hoffman, the great teacher of American Painters, himself a great artist remarked that "The physical eye sees only the shell and the semblance--the inner eye, however, sees to the core and grasps the coherence of things."Tuesday, May 29, 2007
Message From the Universe # 2: received by Owen Ames
Saturday, January 27, 2007
Messages From the Universe #1: received by Gene Fowler
Messages from the universe #1
Have
Ever consort fluorescent
Some walls in Keddah
Keisha or demolish
Us oshea ounce
Down expansive but accidental
But shag cinch
Or eyelid sixtieth
The ss bipolar
Here inland priscella
Jarred may gauze
Jesus the steam
Now studio and bookie
Tell stank it’s antithetic
Before cleanse but mccauley
Elvis may improper
Morris moisten
Both
Brad it’s histamine
Ofelia a covert
Merle subservient
And ambling past
Winifred majority
Well sensitive or illume
Josie ordinal
Again erda
Above diehard citric
It’s almagamate bolster
Mania
Genaro, in pedantic
First pleural duration
Ladonna the attach
Left downtown holler
Find bellini satyr
Wendy, but walk
A upward diagonal
Ted, a frail
Janell, but protuberant
Has baseman routine
Diane it’s mole
Without democratic ringside
How broody but joggle
Turned libertine eighth
Tell careworn frolic
Us bifurcate catalogue
On contaminate numerous
Narrowness gallantly
Later accentual acquiesce
Leola the chord
Former anvil
Already underclassmen corral
Made wu or barracuda
Without Cervantes angel
Also crankshaft some insecticide
Imperative northward
Anybody gelding
Grab flamingo
Everyone knows they’re going to die, but no one believes it
Those but Ernest
Within Elizabethan cinerama
Hugh and strain
Robert it’s duel
First beplaster confectionery
Battalion and coleman
Put dupe in starlight
No cylindric a confederacy
People who are sensible about love are incapable of it
Working oldsmobile it’s consonant
A strike it caprice
During polymeric or baptiste
Than medicinal or thong
Oceanic flannel
If you don’t love everybody, you can’t sell anybody
Once
While oblivion the coiffure
Large dauphine may meistersinger
Of impracticable not monastic
Out gibbet it’s chipmunk
Like drizzly not danzig
Clear dissension some impediment
Thanh or eerily
Towards Eve or Eddy
Told pacemake bluebook
Gregorio a bay
Above workload and nocturne
Sam not eightieth
Same playboy the carpenter
Bluntless legalize
In all that we do let us do it for love
Spore swirly polytypy
Eisner
If it moves, fondle it
Boring naval
Tuesday, January 16, 2007
ART REVIEW TEMPLATE
Sunday, October 01, 2006
Specialized vs Native Percepetion

Virgil Aldrich refers to the Aesthetic philosophy of Monroe C. Beardsley (Aesthetics, 1958). According to Beardsley, Aesthetic perception is a special kind of perception which is informed by experience and an aesthetic education. The more you know about art, the more you see. This is undoubtedly true. However, it is unsustainable from the pragmatic point of view. There becomes just insider art and outsider art. The Term “outsider Art” is restricted by the Insiders as referring to the work of savants, the retarded and the ignorant. All other aesthetic production either addresses insiders or else is relegated to a sub status of “Art in the Park.”
As a participant in the Marketplace of the Park, I take objection. According to Beardsley’s view, aesthetic perception is a product of artistic education. Thus, it is not a natural perception; my own art seeks to bridge the gap between the specialist and the natural or native aesthetic perception. It boils down to the fact that most folks have not taken 8 college level hours of art history, not do they frequent museums and galleries nor slaver over art books and magazines (as I do). I happen to enjoy viewing and studying art. That is my profession. I cannot demand this of my audience.
Granted, there must be a type of perception which is special to the art object. However, the producer should not restrict the audience to the advanced practitioner, grant writers, art administrators, and the artistic in-crowd. The valid work of art must address the wider audience.
Wednesday, September 06, 2006
Pre-Polished and Poised for Production

Tonight I pre-polished my hammers and steaks getting ready for a new round of production. They still need some work. Tomorrow I will hit them with another course of gray clay and then a course of green tripoli. After that, polished or not I'll start banging out some new silver earrings using the narrow end of the riveting hammer as a raising steak for a silver piece. I'll show you what I'm talking about in a subsequent post.
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
Evidence To Lay Bare
There is a kind of objectivity in looking at a work of art that is the same detached objectivity that one has looking at a hammer or for that matter, a pile of shit. This is a physical view. There is another way of looking at and talking about a work of art that constitutes a ‘logical’ view. This view involves looking at the work of art, interpreting at an experiential level and elaborating on it. There is also the ‘metaphysical’ view which is again, different from the physical or logical view of the work of art.
The logical view must be based on what is evident. Evidence. The evidence can be placed in plain view. The act of artistic creation is an act of revelation. The artist reveals the evidence. From this perspective, the artist is the instrument of ‘revelation.’ This term, revelation, has metaphysical trappings but here it is intended in a logical sense.
When I answer the question, “What is this? “In regard to my art, I am answering a logical question. Yet, I am afraid, I am not answering the deeper question of what the evidence is that is being laid bare.